‘Dishonored and Prey’[two games] ‘dev’ [short for developer, the people that made the games] ‘Arkane’ [the name of the studio, i.e. the ‘developer’] ‘founder’ [the person that founded said studio]. So, after unwrapping, it would be something like ‘The founder of Arkane, the studio that developed Dishonored and Prey, says…’.
It is weird, and I certainly hate it, but it’s proper ‘journalist grammar’.
No need to talk to me like I am retarded. You are most likely right, though. I just don’t think humans usually write like this. I could be totally wrong, I am just throwing the possibility of it being AI out there.
This mindset of people in the last few months has become mind boggling. It’s common journalism to shorthand stuff, the phrase isn’t hard to parse, and none of it has to do with someone’s name (reading the article made this clear in the first sentence), so claiming it’s Ai confusing them is just plain wrong to begin with.
Maybe if you didn’t come across so foolish, someone wouldn’t need to explain it like you were five.
Fake quotation of me, attributing others’ “mindset” to me, claiming I didn’t understand it, selectively ignoring statements I have made, twisting my words to fit your point, implying a human couldn’t have had an ai write or help with this work even though writing is one of the most commonly replaced professions by ai, accusing me of stating opinions as fact, insulting me to discredit what I said.
And all of that in just a few sentences, impressive. I hope you aren’t this evil and just don’t realize how manipulative your rhetoric is.
I mean reading the first sentence of the article would have cleared up any confusion, you’ve shown how foolish you are, but bloviate all you want dude. Who just reads an article title and thinks that’s the entire article lmfao.
Act like a 5 year old, and get treated like one, what else would you expect lol.
Also, never insulted you, I just said if you come across like a fool, you will be treated like one.
… so you are a fool for thinking that ai confused a name and title even after having the article explain it… why would you “think” it’s confusing it when you know they aren’t? That’s being a fool lmfao.
Your opinion isn’t valid and makes you a fool since the “facts” show that it didn’t happen. Not everything is Ai just because you don’t understand it… again…
Why are you arguing so badly that this is Ai and the only defense is either not reading the article or just ignoring the obvious…?
‘Dishonored and Prey’[two games] ‘dev’ [short for developer, the people that made the games] ‘Arkane’ [the name of the studio, i.e. the ‘developer’] ‘founder’ [the person that founded said studio]. So, after unwrapping, it would be something like ‘The founder of Arkane, the studio that developed Dishonored and Prey, says…’.
It is weird, and I certainly hate it, but it’s proper ‘journalist grammar’.
No need to talk to me like I am retarded. You are most likely right, though. I just don’t think humans usually write like this. I could be totally wrong, I am just throwing the possibility of it being AI out there.
“I don’t understand X so it has to be ai”
This mindset of people in the last few months has become mind boggling. It’s common journalism to shorthand stuff, the phrase isn’t hard to parse, and none of it has to do with someone’s name (reading the article made this clear in the first sentence), so claiming it’s Ai confusing them is just plain wrong to begin with.
Maybe if you didn’t come across so foolish, someone wouldn’t need to explain it like you were five.
Fake quotation of me, attributing others’ “mindset” to me, claiming I didn’t understand it, selectively ignoring statements I have made, twisting my words to fit your point, implying a human couldn’t have had an ai write or help with this work even though writing is one of the most commonly replaced professions by ai, accusing me of stating opinions as fact, insulting me to discredit what I said.
And all of that in just a few sentences, impressive. I hope you aren’t this evil and just don’t realize how manipulative your rhetoric is.
I mean reading the first sentence of the article would have cleared up any confusion, you’ve shown how foolish you are, but bloviate all you want dude. Who just reads an article title and thinks that’s the entire article lmfao.
Act like a 5 year old, and get treated like one, what else would you expect lol.
Also, never insulted you, I just said if you come across like a fool, you will be treated like one.
How so?
Where did I do that exactly?
Let’s see…
The first sentence made it clear it wasn’t a name, so if you read the article, you wouldn’t have made this claim.
See above.
AI writes iteratively, so this doesn’t mean anything. Also notice the “I think” in the beginning, that’s an opinion, not claiming facts like you do.
… so you are a fool for thinking that ai confused a name and title even after having the article explain it… why would you “think” it’s confusing it when you know they aren’t? That’s being a fool lmfao.
Your opinion isn’t valid and makes you a fool since the “facts” show that it didn’t happen. Not everything is Ai just because you don’t understand it… again…
Why are you arguing so badly that this is Ai and the only defense is either not reading the article or just ignoring the obvious…?