• nebulaone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    I mean reading the first sentence of the article would have cleared up any confusion

    How so?

    Act like a 5 year old

    Where did I do that exactly?

    • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      How so?

      Let’s see…

      I think the AI couldn’t differentiate between name and job title.

      The first sentence made it clear it wasn’t a name, so if you read the article, you wouldn’t have made this claim.

      Where did I do that exactly?

      See above.

      • nebulaone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        AI writes iteratively, so this doesn’t mean anything. Also notice the “I think” in the beginning, that’s an opinion, not claiming facts like you do.

        • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          … so you are a fool for thinking that ai confused a name and title even after having the article explain it… why would you “think” it’s confusing it when you know they aren’t? That’s being a fool lmfao.

          Your opinion isn’t valid and makes you a fool since the “facts” show that it didn’t happen. Not everything is Ai just because you don’t understand it… again…

          Why are you arguing so badly that this is Ai and the only defense is either not reading the article or just ignoring the obvious…?

          • nebulaone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            Sure, whatever, believe what you want. I am not going to waste any more time on this.