• bitjunkie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Who the fuck watches that piece of shit character and thinks he’s the good guy? Humanity is fucked.

  • nuko147@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 days ago

    The show makes fun of the MAGAs, but the real ones are too stupid to undestand it, thinking that the show’s Homelander fans are correct.

    • dvlsg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      They made it way more obvious in the most recent season. That’s why user reviews are more mixed. It was finally obvious enough that they caught on.

  • Archangel@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    122
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    I was actually really surprised during the last season, when conservatives all got their panties in a twist over the show, “going woke” all of a sudden.

    It was like they didn’t realize Homelander was the bad guy up until then, despite him raping Butcher’s wife, melting his “mommy fetish” boss-lady’s face in, getting into a romantic relationship with a literal Nazi, and murdering an entire plane full of people.

    Like, how did they not see this?

    • boolean_sledgehammer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      The conservative grifter accounts they mainline told them to be mad. They act mad like good little doggies. That’s about all there is to it.

    • mriswith@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Like, how did they not see this?

      It’s about 50/50 between:

      • They don’t see anything wrong with the things he did.

      • They haven’t watched the show and have only heard that he’s disliked by “liberals”, and assumed he’s great.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        I think you missed the third option: they are borderline illiterate and/or completely lacking in creativity, and are literally incapable of “reading into” anything beyond surface level, “powerful man blow shit up with his eye lasers wow so cool!” type thinking. It is beyond their grasp.

        They don’t see or understand subtext… which becomes obvious when you see the media that is popular with these types of people.

        • III@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 days ago

          There’s some truth to this but let’s not act like Homelander being the bad guy was fed to us through subtext.

    • tatann@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      4 days ago

      I haven’t seen the show and barely know the Marvel character, but even as a violent killer/vigilante, he’s far from the monster Homelander is, right ?

      Or did they make him racist/homophobic/patriot/etc to appeal the “alt-right” viewers ?

      • Revan343@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        4 days ago

        Or did they make him racist/homophobic/patriot/etc to appeal the “alt-right” viewers ?

        He is none of those things, and fairly antithetical to them, so alt-right viewers love him anyways because they have no media literacy

      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        4 days ago

        as far as i remember the punisher is basically a violent anarchist vigilante who kills anyone he deems a criminal, including corrupt politicians and cops. so basically they missed the point of the character.

        • dukeofdummies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          4 days ago

          Yeah, his targets are usually so vile that nobody questions his methods.

          For anybody that wants to be the punisher though… like honestly if the punisher has gotten pulled into a problem he’s less an angel descending from heaven and more of a fire burning through absolutely everything.

          Like everything needs to be in a state of fucked for him to get involved. Absolutely fucked. Isn’t it better to avoid that in the first place?

        • Saganaki@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          4 days ago

          In the new Daredevil, Punisher is captured by MAGA cops (effectively) and he just scoffs at them.

        • Squizzy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 days ago

          They are very different, one is completely self serving and the other is self sacrificing. They both kill, one indescriminately and the other very descriminately. Punisher also doesnt seem to enjoy it, but feels it is what needs to be done.

        • Stern@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Funnily enough, there was a multiverse thing called 2099 with a bunch of characters in it but like cyberfuture or whatever, had Spiderman 2099, Hulk 2099, and Punisher 2099, among others. Punisher 2099 kills (and tortures) criminals, absolutely refuses to fire on cops, and when Doom 2099 takes over the country, becomes his flunky and starts using thought crime devices.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punisher_2099

  • Jake Farm@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    I doubt anyone actually thinks he is a hero, they just like seeing the world burn.

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    We all love to dunk on reactionaries, but there is no final right way to interpret media.

    According to “death of the author” literary theory, any reading that can be backed up with the text is valid. These valid theories may contradict each other and even the author of the work. (please don’t confuse multiple valid readings with silly relativism that any reading is as good as any other, that’s a straw-person argument).

    Death of the author is valuable and useful. This is how many classic media have been reinterpreted to take on queer readings for example.

  • Guidy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    33
    ·
    4 days ago

    That’s why you don’t make these kinds of shows.

    No, seriously - do you think Antony Starr “knocking down” some fans is going to have the slightest impact or change anyone’s mind?

    It won’t. People are awful and you’ve given some of them a hero. Congrats.

    • terabytes@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      4 days ago

      I don’t agree that just not making these kinds of shows is somehow the solution. How is not having a conversation about such a character at all a net improvement?

      It’s not the fault of the show, which has done everything it can to depict Homelander in the worst light, if certain people deliberately ignore or misconstrue the narrative because the character validates their awful world view. To say that is to say that humans cannot be trusted with the privilege of thought.

      The sort of people who romanticize Homelander would still be there without him, and would pick other characters from history or fiction to idolize instead (if they don’t already idolize those characters in addition to him.) This only reveals a societal issue that we’ve known about for roughly a century, now.

    • Zorque@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      4 days ago

      They didn’t need the “hero” to glorify this kind of behavior. It’s an excuse, not a cause.

    • Ricky Rigatoni@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s like what that one dude said about it being impossible to make an anti-war film that works because depicting war will almost always look cool to the masses. Or some shit like that I’m not a scholar.