In response to a question about how AI works with today’s legal system, Altman said one of the problems of not yet having a legal or policy framework for AI is that there’s no legal confidentiality for users’ conversations.

  • peoplebeproblems@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 hours ago

    There’s no confidentiality nor accountability for the generated words.

    It’s a fucking toaster. You put words in, press a button you get toast out.

  • jaybone@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 hours ago

    AI training can steal whatever copyrighted property it wants. AI is not subject to any laws. It’s AI, fuck you, use it.

  • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Bet you million bucks though, he still wants you to keep using it for your therapy. He wants you to feed as much data as possible about yourself. That data is worth billions.

  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    10 hours ago

    The saddest thought I can think of is telling your emotional problems to a high speed calculator

    • WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I know, I really don’t understand why people would take advice from a mechanical parrot. You’re better off throwing chicken bones or interpreting the flight patterns of crows.