Jellyfin Server has a flatpak (and other packing formats too) version that you can easily install without docker directly on your PC. Would it make sense for Immich to do the same? In my mind it would be super useful, I could sync my photos when my PC is on and when is off rely on my local photos only since my main goal is having a backup of them.

Am I crazy or it makes sense?

  • Strit@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    As far as I know, the Jellyfin server flatpak is not made by the Jellyfin team, but by one from the community.

    So I don’t see what would be stopping you from doing the same with Immich.

    • Luca@feddit.itOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      looks like it’s made by the Jellyfin team, by I could be misunderstanding the meaning of the verified checkmark

  • bitwolf@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    A podman quadlet would be a great way to manage the Immich container.

    Keep in mind your system will already have the plumbing for podman. So it’s not as bad if you’re averse to using docker.

    It’d be managed as a systemd unit. IMO its a better method than flatpak.

  • Irdial@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    19 hours ago

    My understanding is that Flatpaks are generally reserved for GUI applications and not command-line tools or servers. I’m not sure it’s the ideal format for Immich.

    That said—and I’m probably going to get hate for this—there is an Immich snap package that does just what you’re looking for.

    • Luca@feddit.itOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      I wanted to have a little bit of feedback before opening an issue or a discussion there

  • Carl O.S. ©@lile.cl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    does jellyfin have a flatpak app for the server or is it just the client app? So far I know it is just the client.
    I think the easiest way to install immich is with docker.

    @rfr_Foglia @selfhosted

  • darkan15@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    In my mind it would be super useful, I could sync my photos when my PC is on and when is off rely on my local photos only since my main goal is having a backup of them.

    You could do this perfectly with the docker version, so just curiosity here, why not user docker?

    Is it because you don’t want to install docker for only Immich? (you could also install other selfhosted server/apps as bonus),

    would you be against snap? As someone already mentioned, there is a snap version.

    If the important thing is having backups of your photos, there are alternative apps with different packaging formats.

    You could make a request for flatpak, and see if other users also would like it, but you would have to wait for feedback from devs and understand if they don’t have the resources or willingness to maintain it.

    Am I crazy or it makes sense?

    If I’m interested in a specific app, I see what packaging formats it has and see how to install it and try it out. Only if I’m having issues with it (that can’t be solved), or can’t run it on my specific distro with the available packaging formats, I try to suggest/request a different format.

    • Luca@feddit.itOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I know how to use docker (a bit) and I have already installed Immich with it some time ago, but it would be nice to have an easier alternative, especially for less tech inclined people

  • dgdft@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    It’s extra work to maintain and test another release format — and the core developers want to focus on making software.

    No one is stopping you from rolling your own flatpak.

  • priapus@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    If your goal is simply having a backup then Immich is probably overkill. Why not just use something like Syncthing?

      • Luca@feddit.itOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        With Syncthing my smartphone and PC would be perfectly synched (from what I know), but isn’t exactly what Immich does. With it you can remove photos one your phone and still view them when the PC is on

  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    It probably can be packaged in a flatpak but it would be more of a challenge than using the docker package. You could implement your use case today with the default docker compose setup. You could be up and running in minutes. Start it with -d and it would even start automatically on reboot. It won’t consume any more resources than a flatpak version.

    Just try this in a directory somewhere: https://immich.app/docs/install/docker-compose/

    As for docker itself, if you’re on Ubuntu or Debian, you can use the docker version from the stock repos. The package is docker.io and for compose you want docker-compose-v2

  • ISolox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I guess I’m a bit confused, immich does have a few docker containers available, I’m using one for backups and it works great.