• PhilipTheBucket@quokk.auOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        You get the Supreme Court to give you a little piece of paper that says, “I can do what I want.”

      • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        By having congress authorize it, hopefully with actual cause (dear god they don’t even need a good reason…)

          • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I never specified that I was talking about international law. That said, the Rome Statute didn’t exist back then and even if it did, it could be argued that “hot persuit” doctrine allowed it as it was Vietnamese forces that were the first to violate Cambodian sovereignty. I still think the bombing was completly morally repugnant and against the interests of both justice and US war goals, but I’m not sure it would qualify as a war crime.

            Mai Lai on the other hand was a war crime, full stop.

            • PhilipTheBucket@quokk.auOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              My Lai was a little worse than usual, but it was also pretty much the MO for American forces. Lt. Calley was just bloodthirsty enough to do it as an official operation, making enough of a gestalt to attract some attention, instead of just having a handful of people on patrol to do it and then come back to base and play cards after like nothing happened. And then again the next week, and then again the week after that.