An AI system that can be manipulated to spew holocaust denial rhetoric without a clear indicator in the response that it is misinformation is defective and unacceptable.
Go ahead and give me a prompt that will yield what you’re talking about. Or we can just go ahead an trust some random people from twitter and their trimmed screenshots.
And ok, fine, ask it, I don’t care about the pronouns of the fucking AI, my point still stands.
Are you saying it is a manipulated prompt that caused Grok to return the text out of context or that multiple users all fabricated screenshots of a sequence of holocaust denial talking points as if they were returned by Grok?
Edit: Also, the screenshots are from May and there is a common trend with AI being changed to avoid reported scenarios without acknowledging that they made a change.
Now it is obviously set up to manually include refutations of the deniers within the results, which is an obvious attempt to address the type of results returned in the screenshots. So they ‘fixed’ this one specific scenario in a way that strongly supports the screenshots as being real at the time they were taken even if something was snipped out.
Playing whack a mole with how misinformation is presented is shit design.
An AI system that can be manipulated to spew holocaust denial rhetoric without a clear indicator in the response that it is misinformation is defective and unacceptable.
Grok isn’t a ‘him’, it is a fucking program.
Go ahead and give me a prompt that will yield what you’re talking about. Or we can just go ahead an trust some random people from twitter and their trimmed screenshots.
And ok, fine, ask it, I don’t care about the pronouns of the fucking AI, my point still stands.
The point isn’t the pronouns, the point is the implicit humanization.
Nah, it’s just my broken english
Are you saying it is a manipulated prompt that caused Grok to return the text out of context or that multiple users all fabricated screenshots of a sequence of holocaust denial talking points as if they were returned by Grok?
Edit: Also, the screenshots are from May and there is a common trend with AI being changed to avoid reported scenarios without acknowledging that they made a change.
Now it is obviously set up to manually include refutations of the deniers within the results, which is an obvious attempt to address the type of results returned in the screenshots. So they ‘fixed’ this one specific scenario in a way that strongly supports the screenshots as being real at the time they were taken even if something was snipped out.
Playing whack a mole with how misinformation is presented is shit design.