• irotsoma@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Exactly how this version of “AI” should be used. Not treated as an independent intelligence, which it’s not, but treated as a tool for those with independent intelligence.

  • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    This “We’re not” sounds a lot like “We kind of are.”

    You’re using it for moderation.

    You’re using it for editing.

    You’re using it for translation.

    You’re using it as the first thing new people experience.

    Where are you not using it? What’s left?

      • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Personally I would have preferred them to say it more explicitly, but I’m assuming their idea is people provide the knowledge for wikipedia, and AI should help smooth out the other necessary parts (moderation/editing/translation/etc) so that contributors can focus more on the knowledge part.