Wow. You missed my points, and called me a scab for no reason.

You FOR spreading TIKTOK bullshit? Or can you see that it is a sad day to have to work for that company?

Maybe you should look a little deeper and not be such a prick.

They want to work for tiktok? What a shameful existance

Wait, it has a quick blurb on by default but actually interacting with it requires an opt in. That seems like a good balance.

In fact doing a search now (duck is my default) it doesn’t even offer an ai answer unless I click it first.

Here is the really scary part: so many doctors were using Google lately anyways… Now they are turning to medical llms.

I liked the internet better when there wasn’t a business model.

Even this stupid article wants to sell me something.

I am still hosting websites, for free, with no ads. These are few and far between. All this technology and it only has gotten worse while hosting has only gotten easier.

"said that the AI-driven traffic apocalypse is a nightmare for people who make content online…“If we don’t figure out how to fix this, the internet is going to die,” he said.

I make content online. I host my own web pages, I create my own content.

The difference is I don’t do ads and I don’t ask for subscriptions. Like the way it used to be. The internet won’t die, the internet for profit will. I couldn’t care less if AI scrapes my site, it has zero bearing on what I am doing.

The bigger issue, and the article is touching on it “journalism will die”. That is significant. Because any moron can post nonsense on the internet and have it picked up (also why the internet won’t die). Anyone with money in a different business can pretend to be publishing “news”.

I think they are right that AI is not going to save media companies, I don’t know who is going to pay journalists, and there are few laws about owning a monopoly on media companies and requiring them to tell the truth.

I like how everything I read about this uses WhatsApp as a reference. If you are using WhatsApp you already failed and probably don’t care about this, lol.

In any case it’s time to get GrapheneOS and be done with this shit, but the irony is not lost on me that I will have to get a Google product (pixel) to avoid a Google product (Gemini).

Yawn. So work with models without guardrail constraints? I am not sure what the point is here.

Seems like it might be just as easy to read the book they referenced in the prompt and go from there instead of working so hard to break a commercially offered AI guardrails.